PixelFlow vs Hyros: An In-Depth Comparison (2026)
Last updated: 29th December 2025
Last updated: 29th December 2025
If you are comparing PixelFlow and Hyros, you are likely trying to solve one core problem:
How do I get accurate conversion tracking without losing my mind or my budget?
Both platforms improve attribution beyond standard browser pixels, but they are designed for very different use cases.
This page explains the difference in simple terms first. A technical section is included later if you want deeper detail.
The Short Answer
PixelFlow is an affordable solution built for people who want reliable Meta Conversions API tracking with minimal setup.
Hyros is a more expensive option built for businesses that need advanced multi-touch attribution and reporting across complex funnels and traffic sources.
If you want better Meta tracking without complexity, PixelFlow is usually the better choice.
If you need deep attribution modeling across many channels, Hyros may be a better fit.
If you are comparing PixelFlow and Hyros, you are likely trying to solve one core problem:
How do I get accurate conversion tracking without losing my mind or my budget?
Both platforms improve attribution beyond standard browser pixels, but they are designed for very different use cases.
This page explains the difference in simple terms first. A technical section is included later if you want deeper detail.
The Short Answer
PixelFlow is an affordable solution built for people who want reliable Meta Conversions API tracking with minimal setup.
Hyros is a more expensive option built for businesses that need advanced multi-touch attribution and reporting across complex funnels and traffic sources.
If you want better Meta tracking without complexity, PixelFlow is usually the better choice.
If you need deep attribution modeling across many channels, Hyros may be a better fit.
PixelFlow vs Hyros: Overview
What PixelFlow is Designed For
PixelFlow focuses on one thing: making Meta Conversions API work properly without Google Tag Manager, servers, or complex configuration.
It is designed for:
Founders and marketers
Small to mid-sized businesses
No-code and CMS-based websites
Teams that want fast setup and reliability
PixelFlow prioritizes simplicity, speed, and consistency.
What Hyros is Designed For
Hyros is a full attribution platform.
It tracks:
Multiple ad platforms
Long customer journeys
Cross-device behavior
Multi-touch attribution models
Hyros is commonly used by:
High-revenue brands
Info product businesses
Agencies managing complex funnels
Teams with dedicated analytics resources
Hyros prioritizes depth and insight over simplicity.
PixelFlow vs Hyros: Overview
PixelFlow vs Hyros: Overview
What PixelFlow is Designed For
PixelFlow focuses on one thing: making Meta Conversions API work properly without Google Tag Manager, servers, or complex configuration.
It is designed for:
Founders and marketers
Small to mid-sized businesses
No-code and CMS-based websites
Teams that want fast setup and reliability
PixelFlow prioritizes simplicity, speed, and consistency.
What Hyros is Designed For
Hyros is a full attribution platform.
It tracks:
Multiple ad platforms
Long customer journeys
Cross-device behavior
Multi-touch attribution models
Hyros is commonly used by:
High-revenue brands
Info product businesses
Agencies managing complex funnels
Teams with dedicated analytics resources
Hyros prioritizes depth and insight over simplicity.
PixelFlow
Hyros
Best For
No-code sites, founders, solo operators, marketers
Info product businesses, agencies, advanced
funnels
Primary Focus
Simple, accurate first-party tracking
Deep attribution and revenue analytics
Setup
Plug-and-play
Complex onboarding and configuration
Infrastructure
Fully managed
Requires custom setup and integrations
GTM Required
No
Often yes
Facebook CAPI
Native, built-in
Supported
Attribution Model
Event-level, conversion-focused
Advanced multi-touch attribution
Custom Logic
Yes via programmatic API
Yes
Time to Value
Minutes
Days to weeks
Ongoing Maintenance
None
Ongoing optimization and upkeep
Setup & Integrations
Setup & Integrations
Both platforms support Facebook Conversions API, but the initial setup and ongoing technical cost are very different.
PixelFlow Setup
PixelFlow setup typically takes 5 to 10 minutes:
Add your site
Connect your Meta Pixel
Add a single script to your site
Events start flowing server-side automatically
No Google Tag Manager.
No server containers.
No manual event mapping.
After the initial setup, you can trigger events using two simple methods:
1. Page-based events
Trigger an event from a specific page.
For example, fire a Lead event when a user visits your /thank-you page.
2. Element or form-based events
Trigger events from element clicks or form submissions using a CSS class.
For example, add a specific class to a “Sign up” button to fire a Complete Registration event when the form is submitted.
PixelFlow supports a wide range of platforms with direct integrations and guided setup, including:
Framer
Webflow
Squarespace
WordPress
WooCommerce
Kajabi
ClickFunnels
Custom HTML websites
Programmatic API for developers
For some platforms such as WooCommerce, Squarespace, and Webflow eCommerce, PixelFlow can offer instant setup with no additional configuration required, due to how those platforms expose data.
This makes PixelFlow suitable for:
No-code websites
Traditional CMS platforms
eCommerce stores
Funnel builders
Custom implementations by developers
The key difference is not platform compatibility, but how tracking is configured.
With PixelFlow, the same tracking model applies across all supported platforms. You install a single script and define events using page URLs, element clicks, or tagged form fields. There is no need for dataLayers, GTM containers, or server infrastructure.
Both platforms support Facebook Conversions API, but the initial setup and ongoing technical cost are very different.
PixelFlow Setup
PixelFlow setup typically takes 5 to 10 minutes:
Add your site
Connect your Meta Pixel
Add a single script to your site
Events start flowing server-side automatically
No Google Tag Manager.
No server containers.
No manual event mapping.
After the initial setup, you can trigger events using two simple methods:
1. Page-based events
Trigger an event from a specific page.
For example, fire a Lead event when a user visits your /thank-you page.
2. Element or form-based events
Trigger events from element clicks or form submissions using a CSS class.
For example, add a specific class to a “Sign up” button to fire a Complete Registration event when the form is submitted.
PixelFlow supports a wide range of platforms with direct integrations and guided setup, including:
Framer
Webflow
Squarespace
WordPress
WooCommerce
Kajabi
ClickFunnels
Custom HTML websites
Programmatic API for developers
For some platforms such as WooCommerce, Squarespace, and Webflow eCommerce, PixelFlow can offer instant setup with no additional configuration required, due to how those platforms expose data.
This makes PixelFlow suitable for:
No-code websites
Traditional CMS platforms
eCommerce stores
Funnel builders
Custom implementations by developers
The key difference is not platform compatibility, but how tracking is configured.
With PixelFlow, the same tracking model applies across all supported platforms. You install a single script and define events using page URLs, element clicks, or tagged form fields. There is no need for dataLayers, GTM containers, or server infrastructure.



Hyros Setup
Hyros also supports Facebook Conversions API, but its setup is designed for advanced attribution rather than speed or simplicity.
A typical Hyros setup involves:
Installing multiple tracking scripts across your site and funnels
Connecting advertising platforms and data sources
Mapping funnels, pages, and conversion points manually
Configuring attribution logic and conversion rules
Validating data accuracy across platforms
Because Hyros focuses on multi-touch attribution, setup usually requires:
Funnel-level configuration
Understanding of traffic sources and user journeys
Ongoing calibration as funnels or offers change
Hyros does not offer a universal one-script setup. Each funnel, domain, or offer may require additional configuration to ensure attribution remains accurate.
This setup process typically takes hours to days, depending on funnel complexity and traffic volume.
The benefit of this approach is deeper insight into:
Where conversions originate
How different traffic sources contribute
Which touchpoints influence revenue over time
Hyros is therefore best suited to teams that:
Run complex funnels across multiple channels
Have technical or analytics resources available
Are willing to trade setup simplicity for attribution depth
Hyros Setup
Hyros also supports Facebook Conversions API, but its setup is designed for advanced attribution rather than speed or simplicity.
A typical Hyros setup involves:
Installing multiple tracking scripts across your site and funnels
Connecting advertising platforms and data sources
Mapping funnels, pages, and conversion points manually
Configuring attribution logic and conversion rules
Validating data accuracy across platforms
Because Hyros focuses on multi-touch attribution, setup usually requires:
Funnel-level configuration
Understanding of traffic sources and user journeys
Ongoing calibration as funnels or offers change
Hyros does not offer a universal one-script setup. Each funnel, domain, or offer may require additional configuration to ensure attribution remains accurate.
This setup process typically takes hours to days, depending on funnel complexity and traffic volume.
The benefit of this approach is deeper insight into:
Where conversions originate
How different traffic sources contribute
Which touchpoints influence revenue over time
Hyros is therefore best suited to teams that:
Run complex funnels across multiple channels
Have technical or analytics resources available
Are willing to trade setup simplicity for attribution depth



Features and Capabilities
Features and Capabilities
Both platforms support Facebook Conversion API, but the way they provide that setup is very different.
PixelFlow Features
PixelFlow focuses on simplicity and outcomes, not configuration.
Key features include:
Server-side Facebook Conversions API (CAPI)
First-party event tracking via a lightweight script
Dedicated integrations for different website and funnel setups
No Google Tag Manager required
Clean dashboard showing events, health, and delivery status
Automatic handling of event forwarding and payload structure
Three months of event logs
PixelFlow is ideal if you want accurate tracking without becoming a tracking expert. You install one script, connect Meta, and you are done. Tracking additional events or elements can be done in under one minute.
There is no container logic, no tag sequencing, and very little risk of breaking your setup accidentally. Most users see improved signal quality inside Meta Ads Manager within 48 hours.
Hyros Features
Hyros is a full attribution and analytics platform rather than a lightweight tracking tool.
It is designed to answer deeper questions about where revenue comes from across complex funnels and multiple traffic sources.
Key features include:
Facebook Conversions API support
Multi-touch attribution across channels
Funnel and offer-level tracking
Revenue attribution and reporting
Cross-device and cross-session tracking
Detailed attribution dashboards and analytics
Long-term data retention for historical analysis
Hyros is built for businesses that want to analyze and compare performance, not just send clean conversion signals to Meta.
Instead of focusing on one universal tracking model, Hyros requires funnel-level configuration and ongoing validation to ensure attribution remains accurate as campaigns and offers change.
Hyros is extremely powerful when used correctly, but it assumes you are willing to invest time into setup, calibration, and ongoing management in exchange for deeper insight into customer journeys.
Both platforms support Facebook Conversion API, but the way they provide that setup is very different.
PixelFlow Features
PixelFlow focuses on simplicity and outcomes, not configuration.
Key features include:
Server-side Facebook Conversions API (CAPI)
First-party event tracking via a lightweight script
Dedicated integrations for different website and funnel setups
No Google Tag Manager required
Clean dashboard showing events, health, and delivery status
Automatic handling of event forwarding and payload structure
Three months of event logs
PixelFlow is ideal if you want accurate tracking without becoming a tracking expert. You install one script, connect Meta, and you are done. Tracking additional events or elements can be done in under one minute.
There is no container logic, no tag sequencing, and very little risk of breaking your setup accidentally. Most users see improved signal quality inside Meta Ads Manager within 48 hours.
Hyros Features
Hyros is a full attribution and analytics platform rather than a lightweight tracking tool.
It is designed to answer deeper questions about where revenue comes from across complex funnels and multiple traffic sources.
Key features include:
Facebook Conversions API support
Multi-touch attribution across channels
Funnel and offer-level tracking
Revenue attribution and reporting
Cross-device and cross-session tracking
Detailed attribution dashboards and analytics
Long-term data retention for historical analysis
Hyros is built for businesses that want to analyze and compare performance, not just send clean conversion signals to Meta.
Instead of focusing on one universal tracking model, Hyros requires funnel-level configuration and ongoing validation to ensure attribution remains accurate as campaigns and offers change.
Hyros is extremely powerful when used correctly, but it assumes you are willing to invest time into setup, calibration, and ongoing management in exchange for deeper insight into customer journeys.
Technical Comparison
Technical Comparison
Server-Side Tracking & Script Delivery
Both PixelFlow and Hyros send events via the Meta Conversions API, but they approach server-side tracking very differently.
PixelFlow
PixelFlow delivers server-side tracking through a single lightweight script that loads both the Meta Pixel and Conversions API together.
This approach allows PixelFlow to:
Automatically generate and manage event identifiers
Ensure reliable event deduplication
Remove the need for manual configuration
Because browser and server events are handled together, there is no additional setup required to achieve clean deduplication or delivery.
PixelFlow does not currently support loading scripts via a custom tracking domain, but this feature is on the roadmap.
Hyros
Hyros uses a more advanced tracking model designed for multi-touch attribution rather than simple event delivery.
Hyros setup typically involves:
Installing multiple scripts across pages and funnels
Configuring tracking at the funnel or offer level
Managing attribution logic across sessions and devices
Hyros focuses less on how events are delivered to Meta and more on how conversions are attributed and reported across traffic sources.
This provides deeper insight, but also means accuracy depends on correct configuration and ongoing validation as funnels evolve.
Event Types
PixelFlow
PixelFlow supports all standard Meta events.
It does not currently support custom events. Custom events are planned on the roadmap for 2026.
For most advertisers, standard Meta events are sufficient for campaign optimization.
Hyros
Hyros supports standard Meta events as well as custom events.
Because Hyros is built around attribution analysis, events are often tied to:
Funnel steps
Offer interactions
Revenue events
This flexibility is useful for businesses that need detailed reporting across complex customer journeys.
Event Triggers
With PixelFlow, events are triggered using page URLs or CSS classes.
This approach is simple, efficient, and easy to manage. It covers the vast majority of real-world use cases for founders and marketers.
Additional trigger types such as scroll depth are planned for future releases.
Server-Side Tracking & Script Delivery
Both PixelFlow and Hyros send events via the Meta Conversions API, but they approach server-side tracking very differently.
PixelFlow
PixelFlow delivers server-side tracking through a single lightweight script that loads both the Meta Pixel and Conversions API together.
This approach allows PixelFlow to:
Automatically generate and manage event identifiers
Ensure reliable event deduplication
Remove the need for manual configuration
Because browser and server events are handled together, there is no additional setup required to achieve clean deduplication or delivery.
PixelFlow does not currently support loading scripts via a custom tracking domain, but this feature is on the roadmap.
Hyros
Hyros uses a more advanced tracking model designed for multi-touch attribution rather than simple event delivery.
Hyros setup typically involves:
Installing multiple scripts across pages and funnels
Configuring tracking at the funnel or offer level
Managing attribution logic across sessions and devices
Hyros focuses less on how events are delivered to Meta and more on how conversions are attributed and reported across traffic sources.
This provides deeper insight, but also means accuracy depends on correct configuration and ongoing validation as funnels evolve.
Event Types
PixelFlow
PixelFlow supports all standard Meta events.
It does not currently support custom events. Custom events are planned on the roadmap for 2026.
For most advertisers, standard Meta events are sufficient for campaign optimization.
Hyros
Hyros supports standard Meta events as well as custom events.
Because Hyros is built around attribution analysis, events are often tied to:
Funnel steps
Offer interactions
Revenue events
This flexibility is useful for businesses that need detailed reporting across complex customer journeys.
Event Triggers
With PixelFlow, events are triggered using page URLs or CSS classes.
This approach is simple, efficient, and easy to manage. It covers the vast majority of real-world use cases for founders and marketers.
Additional trigger types such as scroll depth are planned for future releases.
Hyros triggers events through funnel and script-based configuration.
Events are typically tied to:
Funnel steps
Conversion milestones
Revenue actions
This allows for deeper attribution but requires more setup and ongoing management to keep data accurate.
Hyros triggers events through funnel and script-based configuration.
Events are typically tied to:
Funnel steps
Conversion milestones
Revenue actions
This allows for deeper attribution but requires more setup and ongoing management to keep data accurate.



User Data and Match Quality
Strong match quality is critical for Meta optimization. Both PixelFlow and Hyros improve match rates compared to browser-only tracking, but they approach user data very differently.
PixelFlow
PixelFlow automatically sends all Meta-supported identifiers where available, including:
fbp
fbc
IP address
User agent
Location data such as country, city, and postal code
In addition, PixelFlow allows customers to enrich events with user data captured directly from the page or URL.
This includes:
Email
Phone number
First name and last name
User data can be captured in two simple ways:
By tagging page elements or form inputs using CSS classes
By extracting values from dynamic URLs
Current limitations
No direct CRM integrations
No external_id support at this time
PixelFlow is optimized for scenarios where user data exists on the page, in forms, or in URLs, which covers the majority of no-code, CMS, and funnel-based setups.
Hyros
Hyros approaches user data from an attribution-first perspective.
It supports:
CRM-based identifiers
External identifiers
Persistent user tracking across sessions and devices
Revenue-level user attribution
Hyros typically captures user data through:
Funnel-level scripts
Platform integrations
CRM or backend systems
Because Hyros is designed to understand the full customer journey, it can associate conversions with:
Multiple touchpoints
Multiple traffic sources
Longer time windows
This enables more advanced reporting, but also means data accuracy depends on correct integration and ongoing maintenance as funnels, offers, or CRMs change.
Hyros is therefore better suited to businesses that require:
Cross-session identity resolution
CRM-backed attribution
Long-term revenue analysis
Deduplication
PixelFlow
PixelFlow loads the Meta Pixel and Conversions API together and generates a single internal event identifier.
This allows:
Automatic event deduplication
No dataLayer setup
No manual event_id passing
No additional configuration
Because both browser and server events are managed together, deduplication works reliably out of the box.
Hyros
Hyros deduplication depends on correct configuration across scripts and platforms.
Because Hyros focuses on attribution rather than just event delivery, deduplication and identity matching require:
Proper script placement
Correct funnel mapping
Ongoing validation as traffic sources and funnels change
When configured correctly, Hyros can deliver accurate attribution, but it requires more setup and monitoring than PixelFlow.
Unique PixelFlow Capabilities
PixelFlow includes several features specifically designed for users on platforms like:
Framer
Webflow
Squarespace
WordPress
WooCommerce
Kajabi
ClickFunnels
One notable example is URL-based user data extraction.
If a third-party tool redirects users to a thank-you page with parameters such as email or phone number, PixelFlow can automatically extract and attach that data to Meta events.
This is particularly useful for:
Booking tools like Calendly
Form tools that do not expose dataLayers
Funnel builders with limited customization
These capabilities allow PixelFlow users to improve match quality and tracking accuracy without needing CRM access or technical integrations.
User Data and Match Quality
Strong match quality is critical for Meta optimization. Both PixelFlow and Hyros improve match rates compared to browser-only tracking, but they approach user data very differently.
PixelFlow
PixelFlow automatically sends all Meta-supported identifiers where available, including:
fbp
fbc
IP address
User agent
Location data such as country, city, and postal code
In addition, PixelFlow allows customers to enrich events with user data captured directly from the page or URL.
This includes:
Email
Phone number
First name and last name
User data can be captured in two simple ways:
By tagging page elements or form inputs using CSS classes
By extracting values from dynamic URLs
Current limitations
No direct CRM integrations
No external_id support at this time
PixelFlow is optimized for scenarios where user data exists on the page, in forms, or in URLs, which covers the majority of no-code, CMS, and funnel-based setups.
Hyros
Hyros approaches user data from an attribution-first perspective.
It supports:
CRM-based identifiers
External identifiers
Persistent user tracking across sessions and devices
Revenue-level user attribution
Hyros typically captures user data through:
Funnel-level scripts
Platform integrations
CRM or backend systems
Because Hyros is designed to understand the full customer journey, it can associate conversions with:
Multiple touchpoints
Multiple traffic sources
Longer time windows
This enables more advanced reporting, but also means data accuracy depends on correct integration and ongoing maintenance as funnels, offers, or CRMs change.
Hyros is therefore better suited to businesses that require:
Cross-session identity resolution
CRM-backed attribution
Long-term revenue analysis
Deduplication
PixelFlow
PixelFlow loads the Meta Pixel and Conversions API together and generates a single internal event identifier.
This allows:
Automatic event deduplication
No dataLayer setup
No manual event_id passing
No additional configuration
Because both browser and server events are managed together, deduplication works reliably out of the box.
Hyros
Hyros deduplication depends on correct configuration across scripts and platforms.
Because Hyros focuses on attribution rather than just event delivery, deduplication and identity matching require:
Proper script placement
Correct funnel mapping
Ongoing validation as traffic sources and funnels change
When configured correctly, Hyros can deliver accurate attribution, but it requires more setup and monitoring than PixelFlow.
Unique PixelFlow Capabilities
PixelFlow includes several features specifically designed for users on platforms like:
Framer
Webflow
Squarespace
WordPress
WooCommerce
Kajabi
ClickFunnels
One notable example is URL-based user data extraction.
If a third-party tool redirects users to a thank-you page with parameters such as email or phone number, PixelFlow can automatically extract and attach that data to Meta events.
This is particularly useful for:
Booking tools like Calendly
Form tools that do not expose dataLayers
Funnel builders with limited customization
These capabilities allow PixelFlow users to improve match quality and tracking accuracy without needing CRM access or technical integrations.



Additionally PixelFlow offers a set of simple blocking rules to easily define when to block events from being triggered like if someone refreshes a page or if they came from a specific location etc.
Data Accuracy and Reliability
Data Accuracy and Reliability
Tracking Accuracy and Reliability
Both PixelFlow and Hyros significantly improve tracking accuracy compared to browser-only pixels. However, they optimize for accuracy in different ways.
PixelFlow
PixelFlow is designed to deliver clean, reliable conversion signals to Meta with minimal setup.
It achieves this by:
Using server-side event delivery via Meta Conversions API
Automatically formatting Meta CAPI payloads correctly
Loading the Meta Pixel and Conversions API together
Generating a single internal event identifier for automatic deduplication
Reducing configuration options that commonly introduce errors
PixelFlow focuses on conversion delivery quality, not attribution complexity.
Because there are fewer moving parts and no dependency on Google Tag Manager or funnel-level scripts, there is less that can go wrong over time. For most advertisers, this results in more consistent data inside Meta Ads Manager.
Hyros
Hyros focuses on attribution accuracy rather than pure event delivery.
It is designed to:
Track users across multiple sessions and devices
Attribute conversions across multiple touchpoints
Reconcile data across platforms and funnels
Provide deeper insight into revenue contribution over time
Accuracy in Hyros depends heavily on:
Correct script placement
Proper funnel mapping
Ongoing validation as funnels and traffic sources change
When implemented and maintained correctly, Hyros can provide very accurate attribution insights. However, because the setup is more complex, there is more room for human error during configuration and ongoing changes.
In Summary
PixelFlow prioritizes consistency, reliability, and ease of use for Meta optimization
Hyros prioritizes attribution depth and analytical insight across complex customer journeys
For teams focused on improving Meta performance with minimal technical overhead, PixelFlow is often the safer and more predictable choice.
For teams that need advanced attribution and have the resources to manage it, Hyros can provide valuable insight.
Tracking Accuracy and Reliability
Both PixelFlow and Hyros significantly improve tracking accuracy compared to browser-only pixels. However, they optimize for accuracy in different ways.
PixelFlow
PixelFlow is designed to deliver clean, reliable conversion signals to Meta with minimal setup.
It achieves this by:
Using server-side event delivery via Meta Conversions API
Automatically formatting Meta CAPI payloads correctly
Loading the Meta Pixel and Conversions API together
Generating a single internal event identifier for automatic deduplication
Reducing configuration options that commonly introduce errors
PixelFlow focuses on conversion delivery quality, not attribution complexity.
Because there are fewer moving parts and no dependency on Google Tag Manager or funnel-level scripts, there is less that can go wrong over time. For most advertisers, this results in more consistent data inside Meta Ads Manager.
Hyros
Hyros focuses on attribution accuracy rather than pure event delivery.
It is designed to:
Track users across multiple sessions and devices
Attribute conversions across multiple touchpoints
Reconcile data across platforms and funnels
Provide deeper insight into revenue contribution over time
Accuracy in Hyros depends heavily on:
Correct script placement
Proper funnel mapping
Ongoing validation as funnels and traffic sources change
When implemented and maintained correctly, Hyros can provide very accurate attribution insights. However, because the setup is more complex, there is more room for human error during configuration and ongoing changes.
In Summary
PixelFlow prioritizes consistency, reliability, and ease of use for Meta optimization
Hyros prioritizes attribution depth and analytical insight across complex customer journeys
For teams focused on improving Meta performance with minimal technical overhead, PixelFlow is often the safer and more predictable choice.
For teams that need advanced attribution and have the resources to manage it, Hyros can provide valuable insight.
Integrations & Compatibility
Integrations and Compatibility
Integrations & Compatibility
Integrations and Platform Focus
PixelFlow Integrations
PixelFlow is purpose-built for teams that primarily advertise on Meta and want reliable server-side tracking without complexity.
PixelFlow focuses on:
Meta Ads, including Facebook and Instagram
No-code, CMS, and funnel-based websites
Simple analytics and event verification
Clean delivery of conversion signals to Meta
PixelFlow intentionally avoids overloading users with unnecessary integrations. The goal is to ensure Meta receives high-quality, consistent data rather than building a broad analytics ecosystem.
This approach works well for founders and marketers who care more about ad performance than managing multiple data tools.
Hyros Integrations
Hyros is built as a cross-platform attribution and analytics system.
Hyros integrates with:
Meta Ads
Google Ads
YouTube
TikTok
Email platforms
Funnel builders and CRMs
Payment processors and backend systems
These integrations allow Hyros to connect data across channels and build a unified view of the customer journey.
This flexibility is valuable for businesses running complex marketing stacks across multiple traffic sources.
However, for smaller teams or Meta-first advertisers, this level of integration can be more than is needed and may increase setup and maintenance effort.
Pricing & Value
Integrations and Platform Focus
PixelFlow Integrations
PixelFlow is purpose-built for teams that primarily advertise on Meta and want reliable server-side tracking without complexity.
PixelFlow focuses on:
Meta Ads, including Facebook and Instagram
No-code, CMS, and funnel-based websites
Simple analytics and event verification
Clean delivery of conversion signals to Meta
PixelFlow intentionally avoids overloading users with unnecessary integrations. The goal is to ensure Meta receives high-quality, consistent data rather than building a broad analytics ecosystem.
This approach works well for founders and marketers who care more about ad performance than managing multiple data tools.
Hyros Integrations
Hyros is built as a cross-platform attribution and analytics system.
Hyros integrates with:
Meta Ads
Google Ads
YouTube
TikTok
Email platforms
Funnel builders and CRMs
Payment processors and backend systems
These integrations allow Hyros to connect data across channels and build a unified view of the customer journey.
This flexibility is valuable for businesses running complex marketing stacks across multiple traffic sources.
However, for smaller teams or Meta-first advertisers, this level of integration can be more than is needed and may increase setup and maintenance effort.
PixelFlow Pricing
PixelFlow Pricing
PixelFlow offers transparent, simple pricing with a free trial.
Pricing starts at $19 per month for unlimited event tracking on one website.
You pay for:
Reliable server-side Meta Conversions API tracking
Automatic event deduplication
Zero infrastructure or server maintenance
A minimal learning curve
There are no usage-based surprises. Pricing does not depend on traffic volume, number of requests, or funnel complexity.
For most founders and marketers, this translates into:
Faster setup
Fewer tracking errors
Less time spent troubleshooting
Predictable monthly costs
Hyros Pricing
Hyros is positioned as a premium attribution platform and is priced accordingly.
Hyros pricing typically depends on:
Monthly ad spend or revenue tier
Number of funnels and integrations
Attribution depth and reporting requirements
Costs are significantly higher than lightweight tracking tools and are designed for businesses that can justify advanced attribution through scale.
In addition to the subscription cost, teams should factor in:
Time spent on setup and funnel mapping
Ongoing validation as campaigns and offers change
Internal or external technical resources
Hyros can provide valuable insight for high-revenue businesses running complex marketing stacks. However, for smaller teams or Meta-first advertisers, the cost and setup overhead may outweigh the benefits.
Cost Considerations in Practice
If your primary goal is to improve Meta ad optimization with clean server-side signals, PixelFlow offers a lower-cost and lower-risk option.
If your goal is to deeply analyze customer journeys across many channels and touchpoints, Hyros may justify its higher price point.
Pricing & Value
Hey I'm Emmett, the founder of PixelFlow.
We built this platform because I was frustrated with having to deal with broken tracking and reporting in Facebook ads manager.
On top of that, the only solutions for setting up accurate tracking using the Conversions API were to hire a developer to setup "server side" tracking on some complex system that it would take weeks to learn (who wants to deal with containers, dataLayers, Variables etc.?)
I also found that every company was just "too big" to actually talk to someone.
I built PixelFlow to fix that.
Our goal is to make high end tracking for Facebook ads available to everyone without the need for complex systems or paying developers hundreds of dollars.
On top of that we are always available to help users anytime. We regularly jump on video calls throughout the day to help with tracking setup questions.
If you want server side "Conversions API" tracking without all of the complexity, PixelFlow is for you.
PixelFlow vs Hyros: Which Should You Choose?
PixelFlow Pricing
PixelFlow Pricing
PixelFlow offers transparent, simple pricing with a free trial.
Pricing starts at $19 per month for unlimited event tracking on one website.
You pay for:
Reliable server-side Meta Conversions API tracking
Automatic event deduplication
Zero infrastructure or server maintenance
A minimal learning curve
There are no usage-based surprises. Pricing does not depend on traffic volume, number of requests, or funnel complexity.
For most founders and marketers, this translates into:
Faster setup
Fewer tracking errors
Less time spent troubleshooting
Predictable monthly costs
Hyros Pricing
Hyros is positioned as a premium attribution platform and is priced accordingly.
Hyros pricing typically depends on:
Monthly ad spend or revenue tier
Number of funnels and integrations
Attribution depth and reporting requirements
Costs are significantly higher than lightweight tracking tools and are designed for businesses that can justify advanced attribution through scale.
In addition to the subscription cost, teams should factor in:
Time spent on setup and funnel mapping
Ongoing validation as campaigns and offers change
Internal or external technical resources
Hyros can provide valuable insight for high-revenue businesses running complex marketing stacks. However, for smaller teams or Meta-first advertisers, the cost and setup overhead may outweigh the benefits.
Cost Considerations in Practice
If your primary goal is to improve Meta ad optimization with clean server-side signals, PixelFlow offers a lower-cost and lower-risk option.
If your goal is to deeply analyze customer journeys across many channels and touchpoints, Hyros may justify its higher price point.
Choose PixelFlow if:
You do not want to touch Google Tag Manager
You want fast and reliable Facebook Conversions API tracking
You primarily advertise on Meta
You value simplicity, speed, and predictable setup
You want tracking that works without ongoing maintenance
PixelFlow is designed for founders and marketers who want their ads to optimize correctly without becoming tracking specialists.
Choose Hyros if:
You need deep attribution across multiple traffic sources
You run complex funnels with upsells and downsells
You want to analyze full customer journeys over time
You are comfortable with more involved setup and configuration
You have the resources to manage an attribution platform
Hyros is best suited for businesses where attribution insight is a core requirement rather than a secondary concern.
Final Verdict
There is no universal winner, but there is a clear difference in philosophy.
Hyros is built as a comprehensive attribution and analytics platform focused on understanding where revenue comes from across complex customer journeys.
PixelFlow is a focused, no-code server-side tracking solution built to deliver clean and reliable conversion signals to Meta with minimal setup.
If your goal is better Meta tracking without technical headaches, PixelFlow is the more practical choice for most teams. If your goal is advanced attribution and deep reporting across multiple channels, Hyros can be a strong fit when properly implemented.
PixelFlow vs Hyros: Which Should You Choose?
Choose PixelFlow if:
You do not want to touch Google Tag Manager
You want fast and reliable Facebook Conversions API tracking
You primarily advertise on Meta
You value simplicity, speed, and predictable setup
You want tracking that works without ongoing maintenance
PixelFlow is designed for founders and marketers who want their ads to optimize correctly without becoming tracking specialists.
Choose Hyros if:
You need deep attribution across multiple traffic sources
You run complex funnels with upsells and downsells
You want to analyze full customer journeys over time
You are comfortable with more involved setup and configuration
You have the resources to manage an attribution platform
Hyros is best suited for businesses where attribution insight is a core requirement rather than a secondary concern.
Final Verdict
There is no universal winner, but there is a clear difference in philosophy.
Hyros is built as a comprehensive attribution and analytics platform focused on understanding where revenue comes from across complex customer journeys.
PixelFlow is a focused, no-code server-side tracking solution built to deliver clean and reliable conversion signals to Meta with minimal setup.
If your goal is better Meta tracking without technical headaches, PixelFlow is the more practical choice for most teams. If your goal is advanced attribution and deep reporting across multiple channels, Hyros can be a strong fit when properly implemented.
Fix Your Meta Tracking Today
Accurate reporting and attribution for your Facebook Ads
Fix Your Meta Tracking Today
Accurate reporting and attribution for your Facebook Ads
Fix Your Meta Tracking Today
Accurate reporting and attribution for your Facebook Ads
Frequently Asked Questions
PixelFlow is not a direct replacement for Hyros. PixelFlow is designed to provide reliable Facebook Conversions API tracking with minimal setup. Hyros is designed for advanced attribution and reporting across complex funnels and multiple traffic sources. If your goal is better Meta optimization without complexity, PixelFlow is usually the better fit. If your goal is deep attribution analysis, Hyros may be more appropriate.
For Facebook Ads optimization specifically, PixelFlow is often the better choice. PixelFlow focuses on sending clean, consistent, server-side conversion signals directly to Meta. This helps Facebook optimize campaigns faster and more reliably. Hyros is better suited for analyzing where conversions came from rather than improving Meta delivery itself.
Yes. Both PixelFlow and Hyros support Facebook Conversions API. PixelFlow loads the Meta Pixel and Conversions API together and handles event deduplication automatically. Hyros also supports CAPI but relies on more complex setup and attribution logic. Both improve tracking accuracy compared to browser-only pixels, but PixelFlow prioritizes simplicity and reliability.
Yes. PixelFlow is significantly easier to set up than Hyros. PixelFlow typically takes 5 to 10 minutes to install and requires only a single script. Hyros setup often involves multiple scripts, funnel mapping, and ongoing validation. PixelFlow is designed for founders and marketers. Hyros is designed for teams with analytics resources.
Yes. PixelFlow supports: ClickFunnels Kajabi WooCommerce WordPress Webflow Squarespace Framer Custom HTML sites API-based integrations PixelFlow uses the same tracking model across all platforms, while Hyros often requires funnel-specific configuration.
No. PixelFlow does not currently support external_id or direct CRM integrations. PixelFlow is designed to extract user data from pages, forms, and URLs rather than backend systems. Hyros supports CRM-based identifiers and is better suited for businesses that require long-term user attribution.
Yes. PixelFlow is a strong Hyros alternative for small and mid-sized businesses that primarily advertise on Meta. PixelFlow offers lower cost, faster setup, and less ongoing maintenance. Hyros is better suited for larger businesses with complex attribution needs and higher budgets.
Frequently Asked Questions
PixelFlow is not a direct replacement for Hyros. PixelFlow is designed to provide reliable Facebook Conversions API tracking with minimal setup. Hyros is designed for advanced attribution and reporting across complex funnels and multiple traffic sources. If your goal is better Meta optimization without complexity, PixelFlow is usually the better fit. If your goal is deep attribution analysis, Hyros may be more appropriate.
For Facebook Ads optimization specifically, PixelFlow is often the better choice. PixelFlow focuses on sending clean, consistent, server-side conversion signals directly to Meta. This helps Facebook optimize campaigns faster and more reliably. Hyros is better suited for analyzing where conversions came from rather than improving Meta delivery itself.
Yes. Both PixelFlow and Hyros support Facebook Conversions API. PixelFlow loads the Meta Pixel and Conversions API together and handles event deduplication automatically. Hyros also supports CAPI but relies on more complex setup and attribution logic. Both improve tracking accuracy compared to browser-only pixels, but PixelFlow prioritizes simplicity and reliability.
Yes. PixelFlow is significantly easier to set up than Hyros. PixelFlow typically takes 5 to 10 minutes to install and requires only a single script. Hyros setup often involves multiple scripts, funnel mapping, and ongoing validation. PixelFlow is designed for founders and marketers. Hyros is designed for teams with analytics resources.
Yes. PixelFlow supports: ClickFunnels Kajabi WooCommerce WordPress Webflow Squarespace Framer Custom HTML sites API-based integrations PixelFlow uses the same tracking model across all platforms, while Hyros often requires funnel-specific configuration.
No. PixelFlow does not currently support external_id or direct CRM integrations. PixelFlow is designed to extract user data from pages, forms, and URLs rather than backend systems. Hyros supports CRM-based identifiers and is better suited for businesses that require long-term user attribution.
Yes. PixelFlow is a strong Hyros alternative for small and mid-sized businesses that primarily advertise on Meta. PixelFlow offers lower cost, faster setup, and less ongoing maintenance. Hyros is better suited for larger businesses with complex attribution needs and higher budgets.
Frequently Asked Questions
PixelFlow is not a direct replacement for Hyros. PixelFlow is designed to provide reliable Facebook Conversions API tracking with minimal setup. Hyros is designed for advanced attribution and reporting across complex funnels and multiple traffic sources. If your goal is better Meta optimization without complexity, PixelFlow is usually the better fit. If your goal is deep attribution analysis, Hyros may be more appropriate.
For Facebook Ads optimization specifically, PixelFlow is often the better choice. PixelFlow focuses on sending clean, consistent, server-side conversion signals directly to Meta. This helps Facebook optimize campaigns faster and more reliably. Hyros is better suited for analyzing where conversions came from rather than improving Meta delivery itself.
Yes. Both PixelFlow and Hyros support Facebook Conversions API. PixelFlow loads the Meta Pixel and Conversions API together and handles event deduplication automatically. Hyros also supports CAPI but relies on more complex setup and attribution logic. Both improve tracking accuracy compared to browser-only pixels, but PixelFlow prioritizes simplicity and reliability.
Yes. PixelFlow is significantly easier to set up than Hyros. PixelFlow typically takes 5 to 10 minutes to install and requires only a single script. Hyros setup often involves multiple scripts, funnel mapping, and ongoing validation. PixelFlow is designed for founders and marketers. Hyros is designed for teams with analytics resources.
Yes. PixelFlow supports: ClickFunnels Kajabi WooCommerce WordPress Webflow Squarespace Framer Custom HTML sites API-based integrations PixelFlow uses the same tracking model across all platforms, while Hyros often requires funnel-specific configuration.
No. PixelFlow does not currently support external_id or direct CRM integrations. PixelFlow is designed to extract user data from pages, forms, and URLs rather than backend systems. Hyros supports CRM-based identifiers and is better suited for businesses that require long-term user attribution.
Yes. PixelFlow is a strong Hyros alternative for small and mid-sized businesses that primarily advertise on Meta. PixelFlow offers lower cost, faster setup, and less ongoing maintenance. Hyros is better suited for larger businesses with complex attribution needs and higher budgets.
